introductory text to our MAASD course, 2013/14
Sustainability
is an under-theorised notion. The
Brundtland definition of sustainable development, proposed and internationally
adopted in 1987 contained inherent antagonisms, that continue to play out
today: which human needs (or desires) should be met? Whose future should be protected? are sustainability and development (as
currently realised) mutually inclusive or exclusive? The scientific method is giving us greater
insights into the likelihood, impacts and proximity of risks we face and whilst
it has also delivered technical solutions, our societal capability to apply
these appears to be frustrated by the very processes that produce them. Einstein said that you don't solve problems
using the same thinking that created them; he also said, 'the environment is everything except me.' Via sustainability, we have reduced the
environment of 'everything' to 'everything physical' , thus excluding
the role of human relations from the discussion. Science and technology are
only produced through human relations, however and this disjunction lies at the
heart of the environmental conundrum.
Some
of the authors in the reading list propose that the problem of sustainability
is primarily a social, not a technical one.
In their view a sustainable world is not only also a socially just
world; social justice is a precondition of it.
(Un)fortunately, the (post)modern processes identified by Berman and
Beck have already set to work on the under-theorised notion of sustainability,
hollowing it out, so that the terminology has become a set of empty symbols,
devoid of meaning; yet at the same time these processes continue in powerful,
reflexive modes according to Beck.
Modernity may yet provide the radical energy to re-invent the
world. This leaves us the challenge of
identifying the roots of sustainability,
as a fundamentally Modern process. If we
go back to the city at the turn of the century and follow Simmel, one of the
founding fathers of modern sociology, we gain an insight into the Modern
processes at work on society as it rapidly shifted from the rural to the urban.
We understand the city as a mental
construct, as much as it is a physical one and we trace the roots of these
antagonistic forces that continue to shape all of our lives. If as Lefebvre proposes, the city is a social
product, then a sustainable city requires first a sustainable society. The immediately apparent inequalities of the
city lie in stark contrast to this vision.
Minton's writing identifies this contradiction within contemporary urban
development and in doing so, only through words, makes it tangible and possible
to challenge through architecture and design.
During
the first semester, we will focus on this theoretical reasoning, sharpening our
critical tools and building our understanding of the history and etymology of
an under-theorised idea. Observation is
key and we will learn to look again at the city around us. Locke's twin modes of engagement with the
world: sensation and reflection, will
be separated once more so that they can usefully inform one another. The skill of writing will be developed, so
that in 5,000 words, a final report will build the basis for intervention in
the city, to be undertaken in Semester B.
Roland Karthaus,
Alan Chandler & Anna Minton
No comments:
Post a Comment